DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts

DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts (http://www.dreamteamdownloads1.com/index.php)
-   World News (http://www.dreamteamdownloads1.com/forumdisplay.php?f=143)
-   -   Taliban Attack on Prince Harry's Base Kills 2 (http://www.dreamteamdownloads1.com/showthread.php?t=233276)

Ladybbird 15-09-12 18:49

Taliban Attack on Prince Harry's Base Kills 2
 
Taliban 'Targeted Prince Harry' on base

Sky News Australia: 04:29, Sunday September 16, 2012

http://www.skynews.com.au/elements/i...ews_795373.jpg

A Taliban commander has told Sky News that Prince Harry was the primary target of an attack on a major Allied military base in Afghanistan.

Two US Marines died and several others were hurt when militants launched the attack on Camp Bastion late Friday.


Prince Harry was more than a mile away with other crew members of the Apache attack helicopters when the attack took place, sources said. He was unharmed.
The Taliban initially claimed that the attack was carried out in revenge for a low-budget YouTube film which allegedly motivated rioters in Libya to kill the US ambassador and three other Americans this week.
But speaking from Cairo, Sky News Chief Correspondent Stuart Ramsay said: 'It appears that rather than the attack being linked to the video, it was actually Prince Harry that was the target.'
'This is quite a development, that the Taliban is confirming Prince Harry was the primary target.'
Sky News sources said 18 Taliban militants died in the attack and another was captured.

US officials said the heavily-armed insurgents used a range of weaponry, including mortars, rockets and small arms fire.
A spokesman for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) coalition in Afghanistan said the attack happened near an airfield on the north-east side of the base, which houses American forces in Camp Leatherneck.
A number of aircraft, hangars and other buildings at the base were hit and badly damaged by insurgent fire.
The Ministry of Defence confirmed the attack, adding that 'the incident was contained with a number of insurgents killed as a result'.

'A clearance operation including UK and ISAF forces is being conducted and we are in the process of accounting for our people, who were subject to a lockdown as is the case when a base is attacked,' the MoD said in a statement.
'ISAF have confirmed that two US Marine Corps service personnel were killed and that there were some other ISAF casualties.
'With daylight, work to assess and investigate the attack continues and further details will be made as and when available.'
Harry, who celebrates his 28th birthday today, arrived in Afghanistan last Friday on his second tour of duty in the country.
Major Charles Heyman, a former infantry officer and military analyst, said he believed the Taliban's motive was the anti-Islamic video rather than to target Harry.
'On balance it is probable that they (the Taliban) are grandstanding a bit, but the real reason that attack was mounted was to coincide with all the riots and all the protests that have been going on across the world,' he told Sky News.
Major Heyman added that military officials should not withdraw the Prince Harry from Afghanistan.
'On balance I think the right move is to keep him there and let's just get on with it and get on with what we have to do for the next year and a half or so,' he said.

photostill 15-09-12 23:02

Re: Taliban Attack on Prince Harry's Base Kills 2
 
Islam, the religion of peace; or so that's what I've heard it billed as.

Just as anywhere else, there are hotheads and those that use any excuse as an excuse for violence. Doesn't much matter it seems what the reason is, always comes out the same. Let's go kill someone that doesn't agree with us. The US is just as bad about it as any of the others.

If I had my druthers, I'd say pull out of the Middle East, let them stew in their own juices. They've been at it generation after generation and it isn't likely to stop until not one soul is left alive. Better they provide their own targets and reasons against themselves rather than having a presence there that provides targets.

If those in the Middle East need to have diplomatic contact, let them send their representative to the US. While at it, pull all funding of any sort from those that support this sort of madness or allow it to happen within their countries' borders.

That's harsh, it's unbalanced in it's response, but it isn't going to stop and our presence there merely provides the fuel that would not occur were we totally out of the region and picture. The violence isn't going to stop, no matter if we are there or not. They've had generation after generation to settle this and have failed to do so.


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:25.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2