Trumps Long Festering Dream to Shoot George Floyd Protesters is Close - DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts

Ladybbird · 21-05-25, 23:48

FED Judge Says Trump Violated Court Order With Deportations to South Sudan

-- The judge has said he would decide on another day whether he would hold Homeland Security officials in contempt of court.

FED Judge Rules US MUST Retain Custody of Migrants Deported to South Sudan

BBC 22 MAY 2025 FED

A federal judge has said the deportation of eight men to South Sudan unquestionably violated his order that migrants must be allowed to challenge their removal to third countries.

Judge Brian Murphys finding on Wednesday was the latest turn in a fast evolving dispute.

One day earlier, he ordered US authorities to keep custody of the men, over concerns that the US had violated his injunction against sending migrants to countries other than their own without allowing them to raise concerns.

The Department of Homeland Security has said it was seeking to deport uniquely barbaric monsters who were convicted of crimes including murder, and South Sudan was not their final destination.

At a hearing on Wednesday Judge Murphy said the Department of Homeland Securitys attempts to deport the men are unquestionably violative of this courts order, I dont see how anybody could say that these individuals had a meaningful opportunity to object, Judge Murphy said.

Justice Department attorneys said his orders were unclear and had led to misunderstanding.

Earlier, a lawyer for the Justice Department confirmed the aircraft carrying the deportees had landed but did not say where, citing very serious operational and safety concerns, as reported by Reuters.

Earlier on Wednesday, the department shared on X the photographs, nationalities and criminal convictions of eight men on board the deportation flight.

Department spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin told a briefing earlier on Wednesday:

Every single one of them was convicted of a heinous crime, murder, rape, child rape, rape of a mentally and physically handicapped victim.

She said it was absurd for a US judge to try to dictate the foreign policy and national security of the US

They did not specify where the migrants might ultimately be bound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28_lsIL_Lfs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApKkkH5zH5E

Ladybbird · 22-05-25, 16:38

FED Judge Holds Trumps DHS In CONTEMPT After Deeply Disturbing Move

A Judge levelled a decision that was tantamount to finding Donald Trump in contempt of its order, following the governments deeply disturbing move

MSNRAW 22 MAY 2025

Former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance weighed in via a Substack post dated Thursday.

In the write up, the legal analyst flagged preliminary reports from this week showing that a small group of people who were not legally in this country were being deported to Sudan.

But none of them came from that country.

Early reports suggested a Burmese man and a Vietnamese man were included in the group that was being summarily deported. The facts were confused. Lawyers went to court quickly, she wrote, adding that this wasnt the governments first outing involving these individuals in the case in front of U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston.

According to Vance, Judge Brian Murphy had previously entered an order that the government appeared to be in clear violation of.

The case is a class action filed on behalf of people who are deportable people who the government has obtained final orders to remove but whose home countries either wont accept them or are places they have credible or reasonable fear of being persecuted, tortured, or killed if they are returned to them, she wrote.

After the case was filed, Judge Murphy entered a temporary restraining order preventing deportations to third party countries without notice. Although the government asked the First Circuit to countermand his order, they declined to.

Despite the court order, DHS removed four people in the class to Guantanamo, where the Department of Defense supposedly took over, flying them to a third country, according to the ex-prosecutor.

The government argued it hadnt violated the order, since the Defense Department wasnt a defendant in the case and the courts order didnt apply to them. There was an utter absence of good faith.

That takes us to Wednesday night, when the judge entered his order on the plaintiffs requests for injunctions to keep the government from deporting them while the litigation is underway.

The Judge styled his order as a Remedy For Violation Of Preliminary Injunctions.That is tantamount to saying the government was in contempt of his order

Ultimately, you cant avoid a collision with someone who wants one. This may be the case the government has chosen for the collision, and if so, the Judge will have done everything he can to make that clear when the case goes on appeal to the Supreme Court, as it inevitably will if that happens.

Ladybbird · 27-05-25, 12:55

Angry FED Judge Throws Trump Lawyers Own Words Back in Their Faces in Slap Down

FED Judge angrily rejected the Trump administrations request to reverse his order to give due process to migrants deported to South Sudan.

Trump Accused of Most Blatant Show of White Supremacy in American History

MSNRAW 27 MAY 2025

In a scathing 17 page order, District Judge Brian Murphy threw the administrations lawyers words back into their faces to show they had argued in bad faith that meaningful immigration proceedings could be conducted overseas, and found the administration had violated his preliminary injunction.

Since that hearing, merely five days ago, Defendants have changed their tune, Murphy wrote. It turns out that having immigration proceedings on another continent is harder and more logistically cumbersome than Defendants anticipated.

Trump flew immigrants to war ravaged South Sudan earlier this month despite a court order requiring ICE to give people being deported to a country thats not their own a chance to argue their concerns in court. Trump lawyers claimed that could be done after arrival in the countries.

Murphy made clear the deportees should be given adequate notice and opportunity to raise fears of persecution or torture before they were taken to third countries, and he said the administration had raised red herrings to avoid complying with his order.

Only one of the eight deportees, who are currently being held in Djibouti, is a South Sudanese national. Another was expected to be returned to Myanmar.

Defendants have mischaracterized this Courts order, while at the same time manufacturing the very chaos they decry, Murphy wrote. By racing to get six class members onto a plane to unstable South Sudan, clearly in breach of the law and this Courts order, Defendants gave this Court no choice but to find that they were in violation of the Preliminary Injunction

Trumps White Supremacy

'Its a slap in the face to every African American and every person in this country who believes in the rule of law' Rep. Frederica Wilson, ahead of Congress? Memorial Day recess.

Afrikaners are the descendants of Dutch colonists who underpinned South Africas racist apartheid regime until 1994, when the African National Congress leader Nelson Mandela, who spent 27 years in prison, became his countrys first Black president.

Now, the Trump administration claims Afrikaner farmers are the victims of government sponsored genocide claims Trump spewed live on TV last week in a widely decried Oval Office meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.

Ladybbird · 21-06-25, 00:30

The DANGER of Trumps Long Festering Dream Finally Getting Its Wake Up Call

Ever since he was ignominiously blocked from shooting George Floyd protesters, Donald Trump has been itching to sic the military on U.S. citizens.

MSRAW 21 JUN 2025

Seizing Californias National Guard and sending U.S. Marines into Los Angeles to deliberately escalate violence brings his long festering fever dream closer to life.

Trumps former Defense Secretary Mark Esper has recounted how, during a White House meeting in 2020, Trump looked at Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and asked why he couldnt just shoot protesters, adding, It was both a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue hung very heavily in the air.

Milley pushed back on that suggestion and other illegal Trump impulses, eventually leading Trump to call for Milleys execution and revoke his security detail.

During Trump 1.0, Trump apparently suggested shooting protesters enough times that Esper issued a public statement opposing the use of the Insurrection Act against protesters, enraging Trump.

Trump made sure that would not happen again in his second administration by appointing a dangerously unqualified defense secretary with few moral qualms. As a Fox News host, Pete Hegseth echoed Trumps desire to deploy the military against protesters.

He defended war criminals who killed the right people in the wrong ways, advocating total war against our enemies? All of 'em, you stack bodies, and when its over, then you let the dust settle and you figure out who's ahead.

A trillion dollar defense budget to kill whom, exactly

Even though the U.S. is not at war, and Trump has shamefully abandoned our NATO military alliances, Hegseth waxes hard on lethality, and rails against woke laws that punish soldiers for indiscriminate killings.

Trump/Hegseth seek a trillion dollar defense budget, not to defend America from foreign enemies who are now Trumps mentors, but to attack enemies within, i.e. Americans who oppose Trumps agenda.

None of this, including Trumps deliberate escalation of violence in LA, was unforeseen. Who can forget how Kamala Harris was panned as histrionic when she said Trump would sic the military on U.S. citizens, following his promise to do just that In October, 2024, Trump said hed use the military against the biggest threat to America - Americans who dont support him.

I think the main problem we face is the enemy from within, Trump said, adding: We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics. And I think they're the big and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military, because they cant let that happen

Both he and Hegseth have already weeded out military officers who would honour their oaths to the Constitution over illegal orders from Trump.

This week, Hegseth inadvertently confirmed that the military, under Trump, will become a domestic force when he testified before Congress, saying, We're entering another phase, especially under Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland.

Its galling that no congressman has connected the dots and asked about explosive military spending that Trump/Hegseth have signaled will be used against Americans.

As of this writing, TYRANT Trump has not declared martial law, but recent Trump history, paired with his glaring mental illness, suggests its when, NOT if

Explosive Court Ruling In Trump Case Has Major Implications For The Rule Of Law.....

Glenn Kirschner FED Prosecutor 21 JUN 2025

As a result of a new ruling by a California appeals court, the peoples First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly suffered a setback. The rule of law suffered a setback. Justice suffered a setback.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals left a stay in place, blocking the trial courts order that Trump must turn control of the California National Guard back to Governor Newsom.

Fortunately, the ruling is a temporary/interim ruling and the case is far from over.

This video discusses some of the unfortunate aspects of this ruling, including how Trump gets to create chaos and confusion in California and then uses that chaos as a pretext to order the military into the streets of California.

No court should endorse such a transparent ruse and abuse of power.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-zFnMg_ul4

21-05-25, 23:48	#1
Ladybbird Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 50,517 Thanks: 28,767 Thanked 14,428 Times in 10,234 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 8	Trumps Long Festering Dream to Shoot George Floyd Protesters is Close FED Judge Says Trump Violated Court Order With Deportations to South Sudan -- The judge has said he would decide on another day whether he would hold Homeland Security officials in contempt of court. FED Judge Rules US MUST Retain Custody of Migrants Deported to South Sudan BBC 22 MAY 2025 FED A federal judge has said the deportation of eight men to South Sudan unquestionably violated his order that migrants must be allowed to challenge their removal to third countries. Judge Brian Murphys finding on Wednesday was the latest turn in a fast evolving dispute. One day earlier, he ordered US authorities to keep custody of the men, over concerns that the US had violated his injunction against sending migrants to countries other than their own without allowing them to raise concerns. The Department of Homeland Security has said it was seeking to deport uniquely barbaric monsters who were convicted of crimes including murder, and South Sudan was not their final destination. At a hearing on Wednesday Judge Murphy said the Department of Homeland Securitys attempts to deport the men are unquestionably violative of this courts order, I dont see how anybody could say that these individuals had a meaningful opportunity to object, Judge Murphy said. Justice Department attorneys said his orders were unclear and had led to misunderstanding. Earlier, a lawyer for the Justice Department confirmed the aircraft carrying the deportees had landed but did not say where, citing very serious operational and safety concerns, as reported by Reuters. Earlier on Wednesday, the department shared on X the photographs, nationalities and criminal convictions of eight men on board the deportation flight. Department spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin told a briefing earlier on Wednesday: *Every single one of them was convicted of a heinous crime, murder, rape, child rape, rape of a mentally and physically handicapped victim.* She said it was absurd for a US judge to try to dictate the foreign policy and national security of the US They did not specify where the migrants might ultimately be bound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28_lsIL_Lfs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApKkkH5zH5E

22-05-25, 16:38	#2
Ladybbird Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 50,517 Thanks: 28,767 Thanked 14,428 Times in 10,234 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 8	FED Judge Holds Trumps DHS In CONTEMPT of His Order FED Judge Holds Trumps DHS In CONTEMPT After Deeply Disturbing Move A Judge levelled a decision that was tantamount to finding Donald Trump in contempt of its order, following the governments deeply disturbing move MSNRAW 22 MAY 2025 Former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance weighed in via a Substack post dated Thursday. In the write up, the legal analyst flagged preliminary reports from this week showing that a small group of people who were not legally in this country were being deported to Sudan. But none of them came from that country. Early reports suggested a Burmese man and a Vietnamese man were included in the group that was being summarily deported. The facts were confused. Lawyers went to court quickly, she wrote, adding that this wasnt the governments first outing involving these individuals in the case in front of U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston. According to Vance, Judge Brian Murphy had previously entered an order that the government appeared to be in clear violation of. The case is a class action filed on behalf of people who are deportable people who the government has obtained final orders to remove but whose home countries either wont accept them or are places they have credible or reasonable fear of being persecuted, tortured, or killed if they are returned to them, she wrote. After the case was filed, Judge Murphy entered a temporary restraining order preventing deportations to third party countries without notice. Although the government asked the First Circuit to countermand his order, they declined to. Despite the court order, DHS removed four people in the class to Guantanamo, where the Department of Defense supposedly took over, flying them to a third country, according to the ex-prosecutor. The government argued it hadnt violated the order, since the Defense Department wasnt a defendant in the case and the courts order didnt apply to them. There was an utter absence of good faith. That takes us to Wednesday night, when the judge entered his order on the plaintiffs requests for injunctions to keep the government from deporting them while the litigation is underway. The Judge styled his order as a Remedy For Violation Of Preliminary Injunctions.That is tantamount to saying the government was in contempt of his order Ultimately, you cant avoid a collision with someone who wants one. This may be the case the government has chosen for the collision, and if so, the Judge will have done everything he can to make that clear when the case goes on appeal to the Supreme Court, as it inevitably will if that happens. __________________ *6000 PLUS* Cases-He's LOST ALL Heard So Far: TRUMPs Onslaught of Lawyers are 'Hitting a Wall' -Judges & Cases Lining Up Against TRUMP France To Ask For Statue of Liberty Back -No Longer Fits 'Freedom' Under TRUMP.. AND Starmers REVOLTING Betrayal of Britain Will NEVER Be Forgiven TRUMPs' REVENGE -Clear & Present Danger -People Who Worship at The Altar of Trump Will KNEEL, NOT STAND Up to Him PLEASE Click DONATE & Thanks to ALL Members of ...** 1..

27-05-25, 12:55	#3
Ladybbird Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 50,517 Thanks: 28,767 Thanked 14,428 Times in 10,234 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 8	Trumps Most Blatant Show of White Supremacy as FED Judge Slaps Down Lawyers Angry FED Judge Throws Trump Lawyers Own Words Back in Their Faces in Slap Down FED Judge angrily rejected the Trump administrations request to reverse his order to give due process to migrants deported to South Sudan. Trump Accused of Most Blatant Show of White Supremacy in American History MSNRAW 27 MAY 2025 In a scathing 17 page order, District Judge Brian Murphy threw the administrations lawyers words back into their faces to show they had argued in bad faith that meaningful immigration proceedings could be conducted overseas, and found the administration had violated his preliminary injunction. Since that hearing, merely five days ago, Defendants have changed their tune, Murphy wrote. It turns out that having immigration proceedings on another continent is harder and more logistically cumbersome than Defendants anticipated. Trump flew immigrants to war ravaged South Sudan earlier this month despite a court order requiring ICE to give people being deported to a country thats not their own a chance to argue their concerns in court. Trump lawyers claimed that could be done after arrival in the countries. Murphy made clear the deportees should be given adequate notice and opportunity to raise fears of persecution or torture before they were taken to third countries, and he said the administration had raised red herrings to avoid complying with his order. Only one of the eight deportees, who are currently being held in Djibouti, is a South Sudanese national. Another was expected to be returned to Myanmar. Defendants have mischaracterized this Courts order, while at the same time manufacturing the very chaos they decry, Murphy wrote. By racing to get six class members onto a plane to unstable South Sudan, clearly in breach of the law and this Courts order, Defendants gave this Court no choice but to find that they were in violation of the Preliminary Injunction Trumps White Supremacy 'Its a slap in the face to every African American and every person in this country who believes in the rule of law' Rep. Frederica Wilson, ahead of Congress? Memorial Day recess. Afrikaners are the descendants of Dutch colonists who underpinned South Africas racist apartheid regime until 1994, when the African National Congress leader Nelson Mandela, who spent 27 years in prison, became his countrys first Black president. Now, the Trump administration claims Afrikaner farmers are the victims of government sponsored genocide claims Trump spewed live on TV last week in a widely decried Oval Office meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.

21-06-25, 00:30	#4
Ladybbird Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 50,517 Thanks: 28,767 Thanked 14,428 Times in 10,234 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 8	Trumps Long Festering Dream to Shoot George Floyd Protesters is Close The DANGER of Trumps Long Festering Dream Finally Getting Its Wake Up Call Ever since he was ignominiously blocked from shooting George Floyd protesters, Donald Trump has been itching to sic the military on U.S. citizens. MSRAW 21 JUN 2025 Seizing Californias National Guard and sending U.S. Marines into Los Angeles to deliberately escalate violence brings his long festering fever dream closer to life. Trumps former Defense Secretary Mark Esper has recounted how, during a White House meeting in 2020, Trump looked at Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and asked why he couldnt just shoot protesters, adding, It was both a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue hung very heavily in the air. **Milley pushed back on that suggestion and other illegal Trump impulses, eventually leading Trump to call for Milleys execution and revoke his security detail. During Trump 1.0, Trump apparently suggested shooting protesters enough times that Esper issued a public statement opposing the use of the Insurrection Act against protesters, enraging Trump. Trump made sure that would not happen again in his second administration by appointing a dangerously unqualified defense secretary with few moral qualms. As a Fox News host, Pete Hegseth echoed Trumps desire to deploy the military against protesters. He defended war criminals who killed the right people in the wrong ways, advocating total war against our enemies? All of 'em, you stack bodies, and when its over, then you let the dust settle and you figure out who's ahead. A trillion dollar defense budget to kill whom, exactly Even though the U.S. is not at war, and Trump has shamefully abandoned our NATO military alliances, Hegseth waxes hard on lethality, and rails against woke laws that punish soldiers for indiscriminate killings. Trump/Hegseth seek a trillion dollar defense budget, not to defend America from foreign enemies who are now Trumps mentors, but to attack enemies within, i.e. Americans who oppose Trumps agenda. None of this, including Trumps deliberate escalation of violence in LA, was unforeseen. Who can forget how Kamala Harris was panned as histrionic when she said Trump would sic the military on U.S. citizens, following his promise to do just that In October, 2024, Trump said hed use the military against the biggest threat to America - Americans who dont support him. I think the main problem we face is the enemy from within, Trump said, adding: We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics. And I think they're the big and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military, because they cant let that happen Both he and Hegseth have already weeded out military officers who would honour their oaths to the Constitution over illegal orders from Trump. This week, Hegseth inadvertently confirmed that the military, under Trump, will become a domestic force when he testified before Congress, saying, We're entering another phase, especially under Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland. Its galling that no congressman has connected the dots and asked about explosive military spending that Trump/Hegseth have signaled will be used against Americans. As of this writing, TYRANT Trump has not declared martial law, but recent Trump history, paired with his glaring mental illness, suggests its when, NOT if Explosive Court Ruling In Trump Case Has Major Implications For The Rule Of Law..... Glenn Kirschner FED Prosecutor 21 JUN 2025** As a result of a new ruling by a California appeals court, the peoples First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly suffered a setback. The rule of law suffered a setback. Justice suffered a setback. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals left a stay in place, blocking the trial courts order that Trump must turn control of the California National Guard back to Governor Newsom. Fortunately, the ruling is a temporary/interim ruling and the case is far from over. This video discusses some of the unfortunate aspects of this ruling, including how Trump gets to create chaos and confusion in California and then uses that chaos as a pretext to order the military into the streets of California. No court should endorse such a transparent ruse and abuse of power. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-zFnMg_ul4

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)