|
EARTH: HEALTH-HISTORY-Enigmas-Astronomy-UFOs-Science-Animals Read & Enjoy Many Interesting Articles in Here About our World -From the Past, Present & Future- Astronomy, Science and Technology, Archaeology, UFOs & Animals .. |
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT |
Hallo to All Members. As you can see we regularly Upgrade our Servers, (Sorry for any Downtime during this). We also have added more Forums to help you with many things and for you to enjoy. We now need you to help us to keep this site up and running. This site works at a loss every month and we appeal to you to donate what you can. If you would like to help us, then please just send a message to any Member of Staff for info on how to do this,,,, & Thank You for Being Members of this site. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
19-08-12, 04:31 | #1 |
GLOBAL REPORTER
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 79
Thanks: 34
Thanked 94 Times in 49 Posts
|
How Healthy Are Earth's Oceans?
How Healthy Are Earth's Oceans?
By Wynne Parry, LiveScience Senior Writer In a new perspective on ocean health, one that looks through the lens of both humans and the natural world, scientists give Earth's seas a grade of 60 out of 100, meaning there's lots of room for improvement, they say. The new index ranks oceans' health and the benefits they provide to humans using 10 categories, such as biodiversity, clean waters, ability to provide food for humans and support of the livelihood of people living in coastal regions. In addition to assessing the present, the index provides a benchmark against which to measure progress in the future, writes the research team led by Benjamin Halpern at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis in California. The global score applies only to waters within countries' Exclusive Economic Zones, because sufficient data is not available for the high seas, they write. A whale shark and a diver. CREDIT: Ben Halpern and colleagues, NCEAS 2012 "The global score of 60 is a strong message that we are not managing our use of the oceans in an optimal way," study researcher Bud Ris, president and CEO of the New England Aquarium said in a statement. "There is a lot of opportunity for improvement, and we hope the Index will make that point abundantly clear." Countries' individual scores ranged from 36 to 86, with the Atlantic coast of the west African nation Sierra Leone ranking the least healthy, while the protected Pacific waters around Jarvis Island, an uninhabited island designated a U.S. wildlife refuge ranked as the healthiest. In general, developed countries performed better than developing nations, however, there were exceptions. Poland and Singapore scored poorly, 42 and 48, respectively, while some developing tropical nations, such as Suriname and Seychelles scored relatively well, at 69 and 73, respectively. The U.S. waters ranked 63, Canada's ranked 70 and the United Kingdom ranked 61. The scores on individual goals varied by country. Here are the 10 goals upon which the ranking is based:
A description of the new index is published in Thursday's (Aug. 16) issue of the journal Nature. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|