DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts - View Single Post - Jack Smith-MASSIVE Trove of Never Seen Docs Revealed in Trumps Criminal Case

Ladybbird · 27-08-25, 11:44

Imaginary and Unfounded Jack Smith Responds to Ethics Complaint Filed by Trumps 'Puppet'

Jack Smiths legal team have filed their first response to ethics complaints filed against him by Trump & His Allies

MSRAW 27 AUG 2025

Sen. Tom Cotton persuaded the Office of Special Counsel, which has no affiliation with Smiths role during Joe Bidens presidency, to investigate whether he violated the law by seeking to quickly bring Trump to trial

But Smith and his lawyers Lanny Breuer and Peter Koski challenged the allegations in a three page letter to the acting special counsel Jamieson Greer, reported the New York Times

The predicate for this investigation is imaginary and unfounded, they wrote. Mr. Smith followed well established legal principles in conducting the investigations into Trump, and the courts presiding over the resulting prosecutions have already rejected the spurious allegations that the manner in which Mr. Smith prosecuted these cases was somehow improper

Cotton accused the former special counsel, who was appointed by former Attorney General Merrick Garland and resigned after Trumps election, of having no rationale except for an attempt to affect the 2024 election results with his investigations of the once and future president during Bidens presidency.

This investigation is premised on a partisan complaint that suggests the ordinary operation of the criminal justice system should be disrupted by the whims of a political contest, Smith's lawyers wrote. But the notion that justice should yield to politics is antithetical to the rule of law

The letter noted that Greers office has publicly confirmed the ethics investigation, but they wrote that neither Smith nor his lawyers have received any inquiries from his office, and they urged him not to reach a conclusion without engaging.

We welcome the opportunity to engage with your office and are confident that as you become familiar with the facts and the record, you will conclude that there is no basis to find a violation of the Hatch Act and that these allegations are wholly without merit, the letter stated.

I just dont see how this comes anywhere close to a Hatch Act violation, Painter said. If Smith had made public statements shortly before the election about the filings, we would have an issue that would need to be addressed. Or if he'd written Congress, it would need to be addressed

I see NO evidence that Jack Smith did anything of the kind. He simply filed pleadings with the court, and the pleadings were accepted by the courts

27-08-25, 11:44	#68
Ladybbird Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 50,644 Thanks: 28,768 Thanked 14,429 Times in 10,235 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 8	Trumps 'Puppet' Files Ethics Complaint Against Jack Smith-Smith Responds Imaginary and Unfounded Jack Smith Responds to Ethics Complaint Filed by Trumps 'Puppet' Jack Smiths legal team have filed their first response to ethics complaints filed against him by Trump & His Allies MSRAW 27 AUG 2025 Sen. Tom Cotton persuaded the Office of Special Counsel, which has no affiliation with Smiths role during Joe Bidens presidency, to investigate whether he violated the law by seeking to quickly bring Trump to trial *But Smith and his lawyers Lanny Breuer and Peter Koski challenged the allegations in a three page letter to the acting special counsel Jamieson Greer, reported the New York Times* The predicate for this investigation is imaginary and unfounded, they wrote. Mr. Smith followed well established legal principles in conducting the investigations into Trump, and the courts presiding over the resulting prosecutions have already rejected the spurious allegations that the manner in which Mr. Smith prosecuted these cases was somehow improper Cotton accused the former special counsel, who was appointed by former Attorney General Merrick Garland and resigned after Trumps election, of having no rationale except for an attempt to affect the 2024 election results with his investigations of the once and future president during Bidens presidency. This investigation is premised on a partisan complaint that suggests the ordinary operation of the criminal justice system should be disrupted by the whims of a political contest, Smith's lawyers wrote. But the notion that justice should yield to politics is antithetical to the rule of law The letter noted that Greers office has publicly confirmed the ethics investigation, but they wrote that neither Smith nor his lawyers have received any inquiries from his office, and they urged him not to reach a conclusion without engaging. We welcome the opportunity to engage with your office and are confident that as you become familiar with the facts and the record, you will conclude that there is no basis to find a violation of the Hatch Act and that these allegations are wholly without merit, the letter stated. I just dont see how this comes anywhere close to a Hatch Act violation, Painter said. If Smith had made public statements shortly before the election about the filings, we would have an issue that would need to be addressed. Or if he'd written Congress, it would need to be addressed *I see NO evidence that Jack Smith did anything of the kind. He simply filed pleadings with the court, and the pleadings were accepted by the courts*