Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 50,628
Thanks: 28,768
Thanked 14,429 Times in 10,235 Posts
|
Neo-NAZI Spy; Judge Has NO Confidence in MI5s Account of False Evidence
MI5 Neo-NAZI Spy - Judge Has NO Confidence in Security Services Account of False Evidence
MI5 is facing fresh scrutiny in the case of a violent neo-Nazi agent after a High Court judge said he had no confidence in the Security Services account of how a senior officer gave false evidence.
BBC 4 JUN 2025
Ahead of a court hearing on Tuesday, the BBC can reveal Mr Justice Chamberlain ordered MI5 to hand over secret documents about the case
He also said there was a further issue about the correctness of new evidence provided by a very senior MI5 officer.
Tuesdays hearing comes four months after the BBC revealed MI5 had lied to three courts about a misogynistic agent known as X. The agent used his MI5 role to coerce and terrorise his girlfriend, attacking her with a machete.
The most senior judge in England and Wales, Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, and the President of the Kings Bench Division Dame Victoria Sharp, will now join Mr Justice Chamberlain to consider what, if any, action should be taken about MI5s false evidence.
There are a range of potential options, from accepting the conclusions of MI5s investigations to initiating contempt of court proceedings against MI5 itself or individual officers or both.
Usually, contempt of court proceedings are referred to the Attorney General, currently Lord Hermer, but in this case, he is technically representing MI5.
Details about MI5s internal investigation into how it came to give the false evidence, which were included in the secret documents given to the court, may also be made public on Tuesday.
MI5 gave the evidence in 2022 after then Attorney General Suella Braverman sought an injunction to stop a BBC investigation about X. She won him legal anonymity but failed to prevent the story being published.
MI5 agent X terrorised his partner with a machete
During that case, a senior spy known only as Witness A said MI5 had stuck to its policy to neither confirm nor deny NCND that X was an MI5 agent during conversations with me in 2020, when I was investigating Xs conduct.
But, in February this year, the BBC was able to reveal Witness As evidence was false.
In fact, MI5 had disclosed Xs status in phone calls to me, which I had made notes of and recorded, as the Security Service tried to persuade me to drop my investigation.
MI5s false claim was repeated in two other courts considering a legal claim against the Security Service by Xs former girlfriend, known publicly as Beth
During hearings in recent weeks, Mr Justice Chamberlain raised the new concerns regarding MI5s account of how it came to give the false evidence.
These concerns centred on accounts of the two investigations launched after the BBC exposed MI5s false claims in February this year an internal one, and an external review by the governments former chief lawyer Sir Jonathan Jones KC, commissioned by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.
In April, the court and the BBC were provided with a witness statement by the very senior MI5 officer known as Witness B purporting to summarise the investigations. They were also given an open, non secret version of Sir Jonathans external review.
Although the court can receive sensitive information and had security cleared barristers, known as special advocates, acting on behalf of the BBC it was not given a secret, closed version of the external review, nor a copy of the internal investigation report and its underlying documents.
After a request by the special advocates, Mr Justice Chamberlain made clear he wanted disclosure of the closed version of the external review. During a later hearing he ordered that MI5 also hand over the internal investigation report described by Witness B, as well as policy documents and interview notes with MI5 officers.
He also raised concerns about whether the open, non secret documents originally provided to the court and the BBC were an accurate reflection of the closed versions.
He said Witness B had claimed the original open version of the report was a fair and accurate reflection of the closed version. But, having read the closed report, Mr Justice Chamberlain gave his provisional view that;
It contained potentially significant material not in the open version of the report
This material raises real questions about whether Witness B could properly rely on the open version as a fair and accurate report of the closed report
Because of the piecemeal way this has come to light he had no confidence that the court has been given the full picture of how Witness A came to give false evidence
New material raised a separate issue about the correctness of Witness Bs recent evidence in these proceedings
The court will also hear on Tuesday whether MI5 will be able to continue to apply its policy of NCND in relation to the agent status of X within the legal case itself, despite publicly accepting it had departed from the policy in phone calls to me.
The NCND policy has allowed MI5 to withhold material from the BBC as well as the separate case brought by Xs former girlfriend Beth.
She had complained about MI5 to a specialist court, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, and then sought a judicial review in a third court of an IPT ruling that allowed MI5 to apply NCND.
It meant that material confirming Xs agent status has been confined to secret hearings, where she was represented by the tribunals own barristers and her lawyers were excluded
A panel of High Court judges will decide whether to take further action over MI5's false evidence
|