Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 50,619
Thanks: 28,767
Thanked 14,428 Times in 10,234 Posts
|
Crime Syndicate-Trumps Attack Dog CORRUPT 'Dyed BLONDE' Bondi Breaks Legal Rules
Trumps Attack Dog 'BLEACHED BLONDE' Pam Bondi, Just Killed Her Career...Breaks Legal Rules AGAIN
CORRUPT AG Pam Bondi SOLD $1 MIL in Trump Media Stock Day of Trump Tariff Announcement
'She was corrupt when she was Attorney General of Florida'
MSNRAW 17 MAY 2025
As head of the Department of Justice, Attorney General Pam Bondi leads the nations largest law office.
No federal precedent, and nothing in her oath of office, exempts her from the code of ethics, federal pleading rules, or the rule of law all attorneys swear to uphold.
The American Bar Association directs in Rule 3.6 that:
A lawyer who is participating in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make an extrajudicial outside the court statement that will be disseminated publicly and have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing a case.
Bondi has broken that rule many times
In other words, try your case in court, not on TV. Only supported facts of evidence are allowed in a court room, demagoguery, and assertions of opinion unsupported by admissible evidence, are not allowed. That is why judges have frequently admonished Trump. BUT Bondi has done WORSE and got away with it
Intentionally Misconstrued Orders
In April, the U.S. Supreme Court directed the Trump administration to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was deported to El Salvador without constitutionally required process. Under Bondis direction, DOJ lawyers argued that they dont understand plain English, spinning the term facilitate to mean removing any domestic obstacles that would otherwise impede the aliens ability to return here.
Rather than respect the plain language of the order, Bondis strategy is to play games to either render the ruling null due to delay or worse, to challenge the courts authority. As an example of the latter, the Justice Department filed an emergency motion to stay the Abrego Garcia order from U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, aggressively challenging federal courts? authority even after the Supreme Court ruled, pleading that,
The federal courts do not have the authority to press gang the President or his agents into taking any particular act of diplomacy.
The appellate court was appropriately triggered. Without waiting for plaintiffs response, the Fourth Circuit court of appeals issued a sharp rebuke, written by a Reagan appointee, describing the US strategy as shocking
The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order. Further, it claims in essence that because it has rid itself of custody that there is nothing that can be done.
This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear.
Abuse of Pleading Rules
Federal pleading rules require attorneys to certify that what they assert is warranted by existing law or a reasonable argument for modifying the law, and that their factual contentions have evidentiary support.
Rule 11 states that a court may impose sanctions on any attorney responsible for violating the pleading rule, including supervising attorneys.
As far as I can discern from public record, none of the facts in the El Salvador deportations have been pled with evidentiary support; Donald Trumps opinion that someone is a violent gang member is not evidence. This means Bondi has either allowed or directed attorneys under her supervision to file unsupported pleadings. That a conservative judge called the latest motion shocking also sets it outside the rule.
Not only is Bondi authorizing her attorneys to file unsupported pleadings, she has punished staff for making accurate statements to the court. In April, she directed the dismissal of Erez Reuveni, a career lawyer, for acknowledging to the court that Abrego Garcia had been deported to El Salvador in error.
Shortly thereafter, a 10 year veteran of the same unit resigned, saying he could not with clean conscience defend the departments actions under Bondi, claiming they ran counter to the law, the Constitution and basic principles of fairness and humanity.
Trumps Personal Law Firm
Bondis latest transgression has not yet made it to court, but it likely will. Last week, Bondi declared that, under the Foreign Emoluments Clause, Trump can legally accept a flying palace 747 jumbo jet as a gift from Qatar, a country that has directly funded Hamas terrorism.
Qatars financial and political ties to Hamas have long been known. In a memorandum, Bondi concluded that the gift was legally permissible, apparently reasoning that because the gift is not officially conditioned on any official act, it does not constitute bribery.
MORE
Trump's DOJ should prepare for 'contempt hearings to start ...
No such limiting language Bondi....
|