View Single Post
Old 24-05-24, 13:11   #1
Ladybbird
 
Ladybbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 50,648
Thanks: 28,768
Thanked 14,429 Times in 10,235 Posts
Ladybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond repute

Awards Showcase
Best Admin Best Admin Gold Medal Gold Medal 
Total Awards: 8

Movies TRUMPs' Co-Defendant- 'Its a LIE-6MIL Jews DIDNT Die-There Weren’t That Many Ovens'

‘Not An Accident’: TRUMPs' NAZI Third Reich Rhetoric Video Alarms Historians And Fascism Experts


TRUMP Posts Video Referencing 'Unified Reich'

Here's Why TRUMP Won’t Double Down on United Reich....


MSRAW 24 MAY 2024








Political experts, historians, and scholars of fascism are sounding the alarm after Donald Trump posted video Monday afternoon that promised a "unified Reich," once again echoing language used by Adolf Hitler and NAZI Germany











"Trump’s continued use of NAZI Third Reich Rhetoric is un-American and despicable. Yet too many Americans are brushing off the glaring red flags about what could happen if he returns to the White House"


Former Trump White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews warned. "When someone shows you who they are, believe them."



The video features made-up newspaper headlines claiming a Trump win of the 2024 presidential election. It asks, "What's Next for America," and promotes “the creation of a unified Reich.”

"The 30-second video, which Mr. Trump posted on his social media site, Truth Social, features several articles styled like newspapers from the early 1900s — and apparently recycling text from reports on World War I, including references to 'German industrial strength' and 'peace through strength


"One article in the video asserts that Mr. Trump would deport 15 million migrants in a second term, while text onscreen lists the start and end days of World War I."


"Another headline in the video suggests that Mr. Trump in a second term would reject “globalists,” using a term that has been widely adopted on the far right and that scholars say can be used as a signal of antisemitism."




Political commentator and former Clinton White House aide Keith Boykin posted an ABC News segment on the "unified reich" video, and remarked: "Donald Trump is openly copying Hitlers' Nazi language about a 'unified reich' and warning about 'poisoning the blood' of America, and people are still acting like this is a normal election."



Why TRUMP Won’t Double Down on United Reich












Donald Trump posted a video Monday featuring what the front page might look like if he wins the election. Beneath the headline “WHAT’S NEXT FOR AMERICA?” was this:

“INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED DRIVEN BY THE CREATION OF A UNIFIED REICH.”



Of all the fascist things that the former president has done, this might be the most specific reference to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.


Anyway, it was specific enough to jolt the press corps out of its inurement. The video led “Good Morning, America” this morning. Host George Stephanopoulos said, rather matter-of-factly, the video is "the latest in a series of antisemitic and authoritarian statements from Trump and his campaign."


ABC News’ Rachel Scott took it another step. Like Stephanopoulos, she said matter-of-factly that “it's normal for presidential candidates to share videos with their vision for the country.





It is not normal (her stress) for those videos to have references to Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler."



The president’s campaign was also matter-of-fact. A spokesman issued a statement saying that Trump “is not playing games; he is telling America exactly what he intends to do if he gains power: rule as a dictator over a ‘unified reich.’” The campaign said the video is part of a pattern.




Trump had dinner with white supremacist two years ago. (His name is Nick Fuentes.) Trump said there were “very fine people on both sides” after the 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville.


The Trump campaign blamed a “junior staffer” for posting the video to Trump’s Truth Social account, saying that it was not created by his campaign but instead “by a random account online.” A CNN panel led by Kasie Hunt seemed skeptical. After all, the video was still up.

Well, it’s not up anymore. Someone took it down. That’s probably where things are going to stay. Historian Heather Cox Richardson said this morning, after referencing the video, “it is not clear to me how anyone can any longer deny that Trump is promising to destroy our democracy and usher in authoritarianism.”

But with the video now taken down, they will deny it. They will deny it and they will deny it. They will deny it in the face of all the overwhelming evidence. And the only people who can keep this story a live one, the press corps, are the very same people who will grow bored with trying to keep it alive.

This we can count on. But we can also count on Trump or one of his surrogates doing it again. At some point between now and November, there will be another “united reich” just as “united reich” was another “very fine people on both sides.” One of the reliable features of fascism is that the people involved can’t help themselves.

They know they should not say the quiet part out loud, but they really really want to say the quiet part out loud. They want to say what they really want to do, and they want their enemies, in this case non-fascists, to accept it.

They won’t, of course, which leads non-fascists to accuse fascists of being fascist. Some say this is a bad strategy, as calling Trump a fascist to people who already espouse fascist tendencies is not going to move them toward voting for Joe Biden.

There’s something to that, but only something, as the fascists can’t help themselves. There’s utility, I think, in maintaining the accusation knowing that eventually Trump or one of his surrogates is going to do it again and prove the accusation right.

Indeed, we don’t have to wait. Numerous Republicans, among them US Senators Marco Rubio, Ron Johnson and Tim Scott, are refusing to commit to accepting the outcome of the election, the rationale being they will accept them only if the election is “fair.”

Other Republicans, including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, have traveled to New York to defame the impartial administration of justice in Trump’s business-fraud case. US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito flew the American flag upside down mere days after Trump’s failed coup.

These acts are not just intimations of fascism, though they are that. They’re compelling evidence that the J6 insurrection never ended.

That the J6 insurrection never ended explains why the Washington press corps has internalized every Trump-related outrage as if it were merely more of the same. This raises an important question, however: how did “unified reich” break through? How did it rise to the level of a weekday morning broadcast on one of the major television networks?

I think CNN’s Kasie Hunt had the answer last night when she said, during a roundtable discussing the video, that “the language here is quite specific." So specific, in fact, that a man like Donald Trump, who can be trusted to double down on virtually anything, no matter how vile, did not double down on it.








The explicit reference to the NAZI regime left no room for him to shuck and jive. And since there was no room, there was nothing to be done for it except to take it down.





Trump Video Referencing 'Unified Reich'




The Secret Connection Linking Donald Trump To The KKK







Quote:
WHAT DOES SECTION 3 OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT SAY?


No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.



TRUMP IN PRISON - WHAT DOES THE 14TH AMENDMENT Section 1 SAY ABOUT MENTAL HEALTH?

The Supreme Court held, in light of the requirements of a prison setting, Due Process Clause "permits the State to treat a prison inmate who has a serious mental illness with antipsychotic drugs against his will, if the inmate is dangerous to himself or others and the treatment is in the inmates’ medical interest."

Ladybbird is online now   Reply With Quote