DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts - View Single Post - Vive la France-Police Slice Boats, Use Tear Gas to STOP Migrants-FAILED

Ladybbird · 09-12-23, 06:06

Minister Summoned to Parliament to Explain Why Rwanda Plan Bill Soaring to £290 MILLION

Rishi Sunak Facing Pressure Over Rwanda Policy After It Emerged Cost of The Scheme Has Already Reached £240 MILLION, Despite it Never Being Used. Another Payment of £50m Was Expected Next Year - Costly FARCE

HYPOCRITS; Why is The UN Sending Afghan Schoolgirls to Rwanda to Keep Them Safe?, When It Says It's Too Risky For ILLEGAL Migrants From The UK?........

Daily Mail 9 DEC 2023

Sunak Says £240 Million Spent is Less Than What They Have Already Paid For Hotels..An Extra £100 Million Payment to The East African Nation Was Signed Off Earlier This Year, With Another Payment of £50m Due Next Year

The payment was made in April, the Home Offices' top civil servant said in a letter to MPs, after £140m had already been sent to the African nation.

The revelation came hours after Rishi Sunak vowed to "finish the job" of reviving the plan after the resignation of his immigration minister this week.

The scheme to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing and potentially resettlement, in order to deter people from crossing the English Channel in small boats, was first announced by then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson in April 2022.
'Something to hide'

But it has been repeatedly delayed by legal challenges and no asylum seekers have been sent from the UK so far.

Until now it was known that the government had spent at least £140m on the policy. Sir Matthew had previously refused to disclose updated figures, saying ministers had decided to set out the costs annually.

The figures were disclosed in a letter to Dame Diana Johnson, who chairs the home affairs select committee and and her fellow Labour Dame Meg Hiller, who chairs spending watchdog the public accounts committee.

Dame Meg told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the full cost of the policy so far had only been revealed after repeated inquiries.

"It almost looks like the government's got something to hide," she said.

Sir Matthew stressed that the extra payments were not linked to the new treaty signed this week between UK and Rwanda as part of the government's attempt to amend the policy, which was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court last month.

Downing Street has said the costs associated with the deal were set out in the original agreement with Rwanda and that it was always going to involve "additional funding".

Legal migration minister Tom Pursglove said the money was being spent to ensure the Rwanda policy was "robust".

He added that the scheme was "key" to reducing the amount the government spends on housing migrants in UK hotels - currently £8m a day.

Robert Jenrick's immigration minister role was split into two following his resignation. Michael Tomlinson is the illegal migration minister.

Labour branded the revelation of the extra costs "incredible", with shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper adding: "How many more blank cheques will Rishi Sunak write before the Tories come clean about this scheme being a total farce?"

"It's basically £100m for every home secretary trip to Rwanda," she said.

The Home Office has said Rwanda has an initial capacity to take 200 people a year, but there are plans to increase that number when the scheme begins.

The department has also estimated the cost of sending someone to a safe country - not specifically Rwanda - is £169,000, compared to £106,000 if they remain in the UK.
Legal challenges

Earlier on Thursday, Mr Sunak held a press conference where he urged Tory MPs to back his plan.

The prime minister was speaking a day after immigration minister Robert Jenrick resigned over the government's revised policy, saying he believed it was destined for failure.

Mr Sunak insisted the new emergency legislation set out by the government would end the "merry-go-round of legal challenges" over the flights of some asylum seekers to Rwanda.

The bill compels judges to treat Rwanda as a safe country and gives ministers the powers to disregard sections of the Human Rights Act. But it does not go as far as allowing them to dismiss the European Convention on Human Rights, as some on the right of the Conservative Party have called for.

The bill faces opposition from MPs in different factions of the Conservative Party when it returns to Parliament next week.

Also on Thursday, former Home Secretary Suella Braverman reiterated that it would fail to "stop the boats" and called on the government to fully exclude international law.

The Times has reported that senior government lawyers had warned No 10 the emergency legislation could still allow migrants to lodge challenges against their removal to Rwanda.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Pursglove insisted the legislation would "close off the routes to try to frustrate the appeals process".

On Sky News he said ministers would "engage constructively with parliamentarians around any concerns that they have".

Why is The UN Sending Afghan Schoolgirls to Rwanda?

At a boarding school in Afghanistans' capital Kabul, the teenage girls cried in fear as Taliban fighters headed towards them.

'You have to leave now or else they'll kill all of us,' their teachers told them as they knocked on the girls' bedroom doors before dawn broke.

The overthrow of the country's democratic government was under way. By that evening Islamic insurgents had gained control of the city. Police had abandoned street checkpoints, citizens were hiding, and the US was withdrawing troops marking the end of a 19-year war to stamp out terror in Afghanistan.

09-12-23, 06:06	#41
Ladybbird Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 47,657 Thanks: 27,646 Thanked 14,458 Times in 10,262 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 8	re: Brit Fishermen & Cabbie Rage-French Tow Migrants Back-Why Can't We? Minister Summoned to Parliament to Explain Why Rwanda Plan Bill Soaring to £290 MILLION Rishi Sunak Facing Pressure Over Rwanda Policy After It Emerged Cost of The Scheme Has Already Reached £240 MILLION, Despite it Never Being Used. Another Payment of £50m Was Expected Next Year - Costly FARCE HYPOCRITS; Why is The UN Sending Afghan Schoolgirls to Rwanda to Keep Them Safe?, When It Says It's Too Risky For ILLEGAL Migrants From The UK?........ Daily Mail 9 DEC 2023 Sunak Says £240 Million Spent is Less Than What They Have Already Paid For Hotels..An Extra £100 Million Payment to The East African Nation Was Signed Off Earlier This Year, With Another Payment of £50m Due Next Year The payment was made in April, the Home Offices' top civil servant said in a letter to MPs, after £140m had already been sent to the African nation. The revelation came hours after Rishi Sunak vowed to "finish the job" of reviving the plan after the resignation of his immigration minister this week. The scheme to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing and potentially resettlement, in order to deter people from crossing the English Channel in small boats, was first announced by then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson in April 2022. 'Something to hide' But it has been repeatedly delayed by legal challenges and no asylum seekers have been sent from the UK so far. Until now it was known that the government had spent at least £140m on the policy. Sir Matthew had previously refused to disclose updated figures, saying ministers had decided to set out the costs annually. The figures were disclosed in a letter to Dame Diana Johnson, who chairs the home affairs select committee and and her fellow Labour Dame Meg Hiller, who chairs spending watchdog the public accounts committee. Dame Meg told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the full cost of the policy so far had only been revealed after repeated inquiries. "It almost looks like the government's got something to hide," she said. Sir Matthew stressed that the extra payments were not linked to the new treaty signed this week between UK and Rwanda as part of the government's attempt to amend the policy, which was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court last month. Downing Street has said the costs associated with the deal were set out in the original agreement with Rwanda and that it was always going to involve "additional funding". Legal migration minister Tom Pursglove said the money was being spent to ensure the Rwanda policy was "robust". He added that the scheme was "key" to reducing the amount the government spends on housing migrants in UK hotels - currently £8m a day. Robert Jenrick's immigration minister role was split into two following his resignation. Michael Tomlinson is the illegal migration minister. Labour branded the revelation of the extra costs "incredible", with shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper adding: "How many more blank cheques will Rishi Sunak write before the Tories come clean about this scheme being a total farce?" "It's basically £100m for every home secretary trip to Rwanda," she said. The Home Office has said Rwanda has an initial capacity to take 200 people a year, but there are plans to increase that number when the scheme begins. The department has also estimated the cost of sending someone to a safe country - not specifically Rwanda - is £169,000, compared to £106,000 if they remain in the UK. Legal challenges Earlier on Thursday, Mr Sunak held a press conference where he urged Tory MPs to back his plan. The prime minister was speaking a day after immigration minister Robert Jenrick resigned over the government's revised policy, saying he believed it was destined for failure. Mr Sunak insisted the new emergency legislation set out by the government would end the "merry-go-round of legal challenges" over the flights of some asylum seekers to Rwanda. The bill compels judges to treat Rwanda as a safe country and gives ministers the powers to disregard sections of the Human Rights Act. But it does not go as far as allowing them to dismiss the European Convention on Human Rights, as some on the right of the Conservative Party have called for. The bill faces opposition from MPs in different factions of the Conservative Party when it returns to Parliament next week. Also on Thursday, former Home Secretary Suella Braverman reiterated that it would fail to "stop the boats" and called on the government to fully exclude international law. The Times has reported that senior government lawyers had warned No 10 the emergency legislation could still allow migrants to lodge challenges against their removal to Rwanda. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Pursglove insisted the legislation would "close off the routes to try to frustrate the appeals process". On Sky News he said ministers would "engage constructively with parliamentarians around any concerns that they have". Why is The UN Sending Afghan Schoolgirls to Rwanda? At a boarding school in Afghanistans' capital Kabul, the teenage girls cried in fear as Taliban fighters headed towards them. 'You have to leave now or else they'll kill all of us,' their teachers told them as they knocked on the girls' bedroom doors before dawn broke. The overthrow of the country's democratic government was under way. By that evening Islamic insurgents had gained control of the city. Police had abandoned street checkpoints, citizens were hiding, and the US was withdrawing troops marking the end of a 19-year war to stamp out terror in Afghanistan.