DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts

DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts (http://www.dreamteamdownloads1.com/index.php)
-   Piracy/LEGAL/Hackers/SPIES/AI /CRYPTO/Scams & Internet News (http://www.dreamteamdownloads1.com/forumdisplay.php?f=276)
-   -   Judge Orders HACKING of Terrorist Killer's iPhone>Apple REFUSES (http://www.dreamteamdownloads1.com/showthread.php?t=881826)

Ladybbird 18-02-16 16:20

Judge Orders HACKING of Terrorist Killer's iPhone>Apple REFUSES
 
Judge Orders 'Uncooperative' Apple to HACK San Bernardino Killer's iPhone
>To Help Investigation in Unprecedented Ruling


  • FBI want to hack killer Farook's work iPhone to bypass its 'self-destruct' feature
  • In 2014, Apple updated its iPhone operating system to require that the phone be locked by a passcode that only the user knows
  • Farook was not carrying his work iPhone during the attack and may have 'forgotten about it'
  • Killers went to great trouble to destroy other hardware like personal cells
  • FBI still trying to piece together crucial 18 minutes in killers' timeline
  • Decision is unprecedented and gives Justice Department a significant victory in an entrenched technology policy
Daily Mail UK, 18 February 2016


Apple have been ordered to hack into the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino killers after federal prosecutors have said they have 'not cooperated'.


The technology giant was given the order Tuesday in an unprecedented ruling that pits digital privacy against national security interests.

The ruling by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, a former federal prosecutor, requires Apple to supply highly specialized software the FBI can load onto the county-owned work iPhone to bypass a self-destruct feature, which erases the phone's data after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...5685094790.jpg


Apple have been ordered to hack into the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino killers after federal prosecutors have said they have 'not cooperated'. Pictured: San Bernardino shooters Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook going through customs as O'Hare Airport in Chicago last July upon their arrival from Saudi Arabia


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...5687687182.jpg

Investigators are still working to piece together a missing 18 minutes in Farook and Malik's timeline from December 2 - and FBI believes that information stored on Farook's iPhone (which is currently locked) could help. Pictured: Evidence markers are scattered around an SUV near the site of the shootout between police and killers


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...5687692533.jpg


Crucial evidence: Federal prosecutors told the judge in a court application Tuesday that they can't access a work phone used by Syed Farook because they don't know his passcode and Apple has not cooperated. Pictured: People hold candles as they attend a vigil at the San Manuel Stadium to remember those injured and killed


The FBI wants to be able to try different combinations in rapid sequence until it finds the right one.

The decision gives the Justice Department a significant victory in an entrenched technology policy battle, as more-powerful encryption services threaten the ability of federal agents to uncover important evidence in criminal or terrorism cases.

The Obama administration, which has embraced stronger encryption as a way to keep consumers safe on the Internet, had struggled to find a compelling example to make its case.

The ruling Tuesday tied the problem to the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil since the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Syed Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, killed 14 people in a December 2 shooting at a holiday luncheon for Farook's co-workers.
The couple later died in a gun battle with police.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...5688082941.jpg


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...5688097072.jpg


Apple has provided default encryption on its iPhones since 2014, allowing any device's contents to be accessed only by the user who knows the phone's passcode. The Cupertino, California-based company did not immediately respond to messages from The Associated Press asking about the case. Pictured: founder Steve Jobs


Federal prosecutors told the judge in a court application Tuesday that they can't access a work phone used by Syed Farook because they don't know his passcode and Apple has not cooperated.

Under U.S. law, a work phone is generally the property of a person's employer.

Farook, an American citizen, was an environmental health specialist with the San Bernardino County health department, which was hosting the holiday party at the Inland Regional Center where the attack took place.

The judge told Apple to provide an estimate of its cost to comply with her order, suggesting that the government will be expected to pay for the work.


Apple has provided default encryption on its iPhones since 2014, allowing any device's contents to be accessed only by the user who knows the phone's passcode.

The Cupertino, California-based company did not immediately respond to messages from The Associated Press asking about the case.

The order requires that the software Apple provides be programmed to work only on Farook's phone, but it was not clear how readily that safeguard could be circumvented.

The order said Apple has five days to notify the court if it believes the ruling is unreasonably burdensome.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...5687281819.jpg


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...5687223566.jpg


The Obama administration, which has embraced stronger encryption as a way to keep consumers safe on the Internet, had struggled to find a compelling example to make its case. Judge Sheri Pym (above), didn't spell out her rationale in her three-page order, but the ruling comes amid a similar case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.


It also was not immediately clear what investigators believe they might find on Farook's work phone or why the information would not be available from third-party service providers, such as Google or Facebook, though investigators think the device may hold clues about whom the couple communicated with and where they may have traveled.

The couple took pains to physically destroy two personally owned cell phones, crushing them beyond the FBI's ability to recover information from them.
They also removed a hard drive from their computer; it has not been found despite investigators diving for days for potential electronic evidence in a nearby lake.

Farook was not carrying his work iPhone during the attack.

It was discovered after a subsequent search. It was not known whether Farook forgot about the iPhone or did not care whether investigators found it.

The phone was running the newest version of Apple's iPhone operating system, which requires a passcode and cannot be accessed by Apple, unlike earlier operating systems or older phone models.

San Bernardino County provided Farook with an iPhone configured to erase data after 10 consecutive unsuccessful unlocking attempts.
The FBI said that feature appeared to be active on Farook's iPhone as of the last time he performed a backup.

The California judge didn't spell out her rationale in her three-page order, but the ruling comes amid a similar case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
In that case, Magistrate Judge James Orenstein has not yet decided whether the government can compel Apple to unlock an iPhone under the same 18th century law applied to the California case.

The All Writs Act has been used to compel a party to help the government in its law enforcement efforts, but Apple has argued that it is not its role to act as a government agent and that doing so would breach trust with its customers.

Investigators are still working to piece together a missing 18 minutes in Farook and Malik's timeline from December 2.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...9505670886.jpg


Practice: Officials say Farook visited a gun range in the days leading up to the attack, firing an AR-15 and a handgun, which would later be used to kill 14 people and injure 21 others



Quote:



TIMELINE OF TERROR MARRIAGE


Tashfeen Malik entered the US for the first time on July 27, 2014, on a K-1 or 'fiance' visa. The visa program allows foreign residents intending to marry American citizens to live with them in the US for up to 90 days prior to the wedding.

Before entering the country, the partner has to undergo several rounds of counter-terrorism screening and a medical exam. Malik would have also had to undergo a one-on-one interview with an embassy official in her home country of Pakistan.

However, already questions are swirling about how the checklist works. For example, Fox News reported that Malik cited an incorrect home address in Pakistan on her visa application and it wasn't picked up by the authorities.


The couple reportedly met on a Muslim dating website sometime in 2013.

They came face-to-face for the first time in Saudi Arabia in July 2014 when Farook took a two-week vacation to meet his bride-to-be and her family.


A new photograph shows the new couple arriving in Chicago's O'Hare International Airport on the evening of July 27, 2014.

The pair were reportedly married in Riverside, California, in August 2014. Farook petitioned to have his wife's immigration status changed to Legal Permanent Resident in September.
It is likely the couple also had a religious ceremony in Saudi Arabia before Malik moved to the US, although this hasn't been confirmed.



Officials have concluded they were at least partly inspired by the Islamic State group; Malik's Facebook page included a note pledging allegiance to the group's leader around the time of the attack.

In 2014, Apple updated its iPhone operating system to require that the phone be locked by a passcode that only the user knows.

Previously, the company could use an extraction tool that would physically plug into the phone and allow it to respond to search warrant requests from the government.

FBI Director James Comey told members of Congress last week that investigators in the case had been unable to access a phone in the California case but provided no details.
'It is a big problem for law enforcement armed with a search warrant when you find a device that can't be opened even when a judge says there's probable cause to open it,' Comey said.

'It affects our counterterrorism work. San Bernardino, a very important investigation to us, we still have one of those killers' phones that we have not been able to open, and it's been over two months and we're still working on it.'
END


NB: So the FBI do not have any TECHs with good enough brains, to match those that work for APPLE?.... :dunno: ... :laff:...

.

READ MORE;

Now Google CEO backs Apple for refusing to unlock terrorist's iPhone

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...5806205988.jpg

.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2