Go Back   DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts > World News/Sport/Weather > Piracy/Warez/Legal/Hackers/Scams & Internet News

Piracy/Warez/Legal/Hackers/Scams & Internet News Anything Related to Piracy, Warez, Legal Matters, Hackers, Internet News & Scams and How it Affects Sites/Members Can Be Read Here. Please do NOT post links to other Sites, but you May Name Them if They are Scam Sites

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
Hallo to All Members. As you can see we regularly Upgrade our Servers, (Sorry for any Downtime during this). We also have added more Forums to help you with many things and for you to enjoy. We now need you to help us to keep this site up and running. This site works at a loss every month and we appeal to you to donate what you can. If you would like to help us, then please just send a message to any Member of Staff for info on how to do this,,,, & Thank You for Being Members of this site.
Post New ThreadReply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-06-12, 21:22   #1
 
Ladybbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 34,550
Thanks: 23,332
Thanked 12,710 Times in 8,550 Posts
Ladybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond repute

Awards Showcase
Best Admin Best Admin Gold Medal Gold Medal 
Total Awards: 6

Pirate Megaupload: U.S. Intentionally Disrespects Foreign Sovereignty

Megaupload: U.S. Intentionally Disrespects Foreign Sovereignty

Posted: 22 Jun 2012 Ernesto

Last month Megaupload asked the court to dismiss the case because U.S. law doesn’t permit criminal proceedings against foreign companies.

The issue has become crucial in the ongoing Megaupload proceedings, as it may lead to a premature dismissal of the case.

According to “Rule 4″ of criminal procedure the authorities have to serve a company at an address in the United States. However, since Megaupload is a Hong Kong company, this was and is impossible.

As a result Megaupload asked the court to dismiss the case, but this request was opposed by the Government last week. According to the Government, the federal rules shouldn’t be interpreted so narrowly. A company should only be served on a U.S. address if they have one, the U.S. argued.

Megaupload’s team is not buying into this argument and submitted a detailed rebuttal to the court yesterday, explaining why the case should be dismissed.

“If the drafters‘ sole objective in imposing the mailing requirement was to ensure that a corporate defendant received sufficient notice, they could have drafted the rule to require that the Government send a copy of the summons to the company‘s last known address anywhere in the world.

Instead, the drafters specifically mandated that the summons be mailed to an address within the United States.”

In addition Megaupload’s legal team replies to the Government’s argument that it’s not required to serve a company as long as “the corporate defendant receives sufficient notice of the charges.”

This reasoning is “self-invented” and not supported by previous cases according to Megaupload. Instead, it’s an attempt to “rewrite — or, rather, erase” existing rules.

Talking to TorrentFreak, Megaupload lawyer Ira Rothken reiterated that the Department of Justice is not playing by the book.

“The DOJ failed to follow the rules which requires a foreign corporation to have an office in the United States as a condition of service of an indictment,” Rothken said.

“Megaupload Ltd is a Hong Kong corporation and has never had an office in the United States. The rules on service of an indictment are designed in part to respect foreign sovereignty,” Rothken adds.

While the DOJ’s failure might have been the result of sheer incompetence, the fact that the Government continues to ignore the rules is clearly intentional.

“The DOJ has read Megaupload’s motion to dismiss and refused to voluntarily dismiss the indictment against Megaupload – the DOJ maintenance of such a flawed criminal action if brought by mistake is now intentional,” Rothken told TorrentFreak.

Megaupload’s legal team has requested that the court discuss the above, and several other points that were raised, in an oral hearing later this month.

.
__________________
Nil Carborundum Illegitemi My Advice is Free My Friendship is Priceless

FREEBIES Continue to be a BURDEN on Our Increasing Server/Privacy Costs. Please DONATE Something to HELP...PM an Admin for Further Info.



& Thanks to Those That Have Taken The Time to Register & Become a Member of ... 1...
Ladybbird is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Post New ThreadReply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2
Designed by: vBSkinworks