Go Back   DreamTeamDownloads1, FTP Help, Movies, Bollywood, Applications, etc. & Mature Sex Forum, Rapidshare, Filefactory, Freakshare, Rapidgator, Turbobit, & More MULTI Filehosts > World News/Sport/Weather > Piracy/Warez/Legal/Hackers/Scams & Internet News

Piracy/Warez/Legal/Hackers/Scams & Internet News Anything Related to Piracy, Warez, Legal Matters, Hackers, Internet News & Scams and How it Affects Sites/Members Can Be Read Here. Please do NOT post links to other Sites, but you May Name Them if They are Scam Sites

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
Hallo to All Members. As you can see we regularly Upgrade our Servers, (Sorry for any Downtime during this). We also have added more Forums to help you with many things and for you to enjoy. We now need you to help us to keep this site up and running. This site works at a loss every month and we appeal to you to donate what you can. If you would like to help us, then please just send a message to any Member of Staff for info on how to do this,,,, & Thank You for Being Members of this site.
Post New ThreadReply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-04-12, 23:23   #1
 
Ladybbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 34,897
Thanks: 23,567
Thanked 12,734 Times in 8,570 Posts
Ladybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond reputeLadybbird has a reputation beyond repute

Awards Showcase
Best Admin Best Admin Gold Medal Gold Medal 
Total Awards: 6

Default FCC Clears Google in Wi-Fi Sniffing Debacle

Contradicting a Federal Judge, FCC Clears Google in Wi-Fi Sniffing Debacle Source:Wired.com, 17 April 2012




The Federal Communications Commission is clearing Google of wrongdoing in connection to it secretly intercepting Americans’ data on unencrypted Wi-Fi routers.
The commission concluded Friday, in an order unveiled Monday, that no wiretapping laws were violated when the search giant’s Street View mapping cars eavesdropped on open Wi-Fi networks across America. The FCC said that, between 2008 and 2010, “Google’s Street View cars collected names, addresses, telephone numbers, URL’s, passwords, e-mail, text messages, medical records, video and audio files, and other information from internet users in the United States.”

Last year, a federal judge ruled that the search-and-advertising giant could be held liable for violating federal wiretapping law, giving the greenlight to lawsuits seeking damages over Google’s objections.
But the commission, which fined Google $25,000 for stonewalling the investigation, found that legal precedent — and an unnamed Google engineer’s refusal to speak to FCC investigators — meant Google was off the hook for wiretapping.

Quote:
“Based on careful review of the existing record and applicable law, the bureau will not take enforcement action,” the FCC’s enforcement bureau wrote in a heavily redacted 25-page order.
The agency commenced an investigation after the Electronic Privacy Information Center demanded that the government review Google’s behavior.

The flap has wide-ranging implications for the millions who use open, unencrypted Wi-Fi networks at coffee shops, restaurants or any other business that tries to attract customers by providing free Wi-Fi. Google, while apologizing for its actions, also strenuously argues that it did nothing illegal by sniffing WiFi networks and storing the contents of citizens’ communications.

That argument didn’t pass muster last year with U.S. District Judge James Ware of California. Ware found lawyers representing the public had pleaded “facts sufficient to state a claim for violation of the Wiretap Act.” That means Google could be liable for wiretapping damages for secretly intercepting the data, a decision that Google is appealing.
What’s more, Joel Burin, the FCC’s consumer and government affairs bureau chief, wrote in 2010 that

Quote:
“Google’s behavior also raises important concerns. Whether intentional or not, collecting information sent over Wi-Fi networks clearly infringes on consumer privacy.”
Despite those harsh words, the FCC agreed with Google that its actions did not amount to wiretapping because the unencrypted Wi-Fi signals were “readily accessible to the general public.”
The contradiction did not escape EPIC which said on its blog Monday that, “Surprisingly, the FCC said that Google had not violated the federal Wiretap Act, even though a federal court recently held otherwise.”

Google said it didn’t realize it was sniffing packets of data on unsecured Wi-Fi networks in about a dozen countries until German privacy authorities began questioning what data Google’s Street View cars were collecting. Google, along with other companies, use databases of Wi-Fi networks and their locations to augment or replace GPS when attempting to figure out the location of a computer or mobile device.

The FCC found that Google also “collected and stored encrypted communications sent over unencrypted Wi-Fi networks,” but the FCC found no evidence that Google accessed that data.
The FCC said that an engineer who developed the program asserted the Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination, which “made it impossible to determine in the course of our investigation whether Google did make any use of the encrypted communications that it collected.”
Google has said the affair was a `Mistake and that it only collected “fragments” of data as its Street View cars drove through neighborhoods. Google said it has not reviewed the data.

According to the`Wiretap Act, amended in 1986, it’s not considered wiretapping “to intercept or access an electronic communication made through an electronic communication system that is configured so that such electronic communication is readily accessible to the general public.”

But Judge Ware said that interpretation did not apply to open, unencrypted Wi-Fi networks and instead applied only to “traditional radio services” like police scanners.
France, Canada and the Netherlands have concluded that Google’s collection of payload data violated their data protection, online privacy, or similar laws and regulations. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission had opened and closed an inquiry in 2010 without taking any action against Google.
__________________
Nil Carborundum Illegitemi My Advice is Free My Friendship is Priceless

FREEBIES Continue to be a BURDEN on Our Increasing Server/Privacy Costs. Please DONATE Something to HELP...PM an Admin for Further Info.



& Thanks to Those That Have Taken The Time to Register & Become a Member of ... 1...
Ladybbird is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Post New ThreadReply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2
Designed by: vBSkinworks